Judging by the word on the street (or in the church), it seems we have some “identity issues.” These issues seem to stem from the anxiety caused by lower attendance and decreased membership in the local and national church alike. We have been talking about our identity as a parish at St. Alban’s lately and at last year’s Diocesan Convention the keynote speaker, Dwight J. Zscheile, presented thoughts from his latest book, People of the Way: Renewing Episcopal Identity. In just the last few days our seminarian Mary Bea Sullivan added a blog post titled Why millennials are leaving the church to the St. Alban’s Facebook page: http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2013/07/27/why-millennials-are-leaving-the-church
Interestingly enough, the blog about millennials gives the Episcopal Church high ranking (if not by all millennials at least by the author herself) for liturgy and worship that is “unpretentious, unconcerned with being ‘cool’ and refreshingly authentic.” The author, Rachel Held Evans, lists six things millennials “want” (demand?) from the church, from openness about sex and gender to getting real about the relationship between God and science and for the ‘challenge to holiness’ that the church should be issuing to its members. Each and every one of these wants, it seems to me, are things that many Episcopal Churches (and St. Alban’s in particular) has in spades.
And yet, are millennials flocking to our wonderful church? How is it that we seem to embody all that a millennial would “want” from a church and yet still see lower rates of attendance and the need to question our identity? Do we need a bigger sign? Better advertising?
On the other hand, could the millennials be kidding themselves about really wanting church? Might all of us be (Jesus might ask)?
Or could it be that we are in fact doing everything right (from liturgy to challenge) but just haven’t had the time to give birth to a new generation of Episcopalians?
In her posting, Rachel Held Evans writes that the church can’t just hand millennials a cup of latte, go about business as usual and expect them to stick around. I guess this means that the church had the millennials and then lost them, or that they came and went when all they were offered was a lame version of Starbucks. She also writes that “we are not leaving church because we don’t find the cool factor there; we’re leaving church because we don’t find Jesus there.” Although her comments seem to be pointed primarily toward the evangelical traditions, ouch! This hurts. No pain no gain?
She also writes that responses to her writing about the church include all-caps replies (ME TOO!) from other generations; from grandmothers and forty-somethings, Generation Xers and retirees. Evidently the church is failing everyone. Evans maintains that winning millennials back (it’s unclear if she is speaking for the ME-TOO’s here as well) amounts to this: that church leaders “sit down and really talk with them about what they are looking for and what they would like to contribute to a faith community.” She says that the answers might surprise us.
With all due respect to Evan’s work, which, according to Mary Bea, is popular among seminarians, I wish it were that simple. For those of us who are leaders in the church, the last time I checked (was it yesterday or the day before?), we were more than willing to sit down and talk with anyone willing to contribute to the faith community. Speaking on behalf of all church leaders, I repeat: WE ARE WILLING TO SIT DOWN AND TALK.
It is true that Jesus himself asked his early followers, “What are you looking for?” But Jesus’ questions were more a matter of weeding out the uncommitted rather than including the masses. He started with twelve, ended with, um, none, and the rest just wanted bread. More, the Jesus that Evans mentions as missing from the church is the same Jesus who, if the responses to his expectations came via e-mail, would have read this: YOU WANT ME TO DO WHAT?
Admittedly, I feel a little like Shakespeare’s lady here… As in, “thou doth protest too much.” But only because I’m baffled. I believe that we are doing our very best as the church and yet I wonder if we have yet to ask ourselves the hardest (or perhaps the right) questions. Or maybe there’s only one real question… “Peter, do you love me?”
I’ll also admit some skepticism about the future of a renewed church being a matter of asking millennials what they want. If the future of the church is in fact that simple, and if one generation holds the keys to the kingdom, I hope I’m wrong. And maybe I’m overstating the implications of Evan’s argument. If not, I also hope I’m underestimating the power of their commitment (no matter how many of them are out out there) to live lives of radical holiness that can trump the devices of that wily devil at work in the world.
There’s one thing I do know: If the millennial generation is to bring new life to the church they won’t do so by asking “the church leaders to sit down and really talk” but rather by becoming the church’s leaders themselves.
The want ad has been issued. All that’s left is the surprise. I hope it’s a birthday party…
Good “Cup.” Excellent topic. But I fear I lost the point you were trying to make 3/4’s of the way through. There are more Millenials (78 million born between 1980 and 2000) than there are Baby Boomers (roughly 75 million), so this new demographic bulge deserves watching. A key fact of the Millenials is that most are not married yet and don’t have children. When the little ones come, I expect they will reconsider whether the church is important in their lives, and the lives of their little ones.
OK, see you Sunday?
This kinda feels like church as focus group.
I think we begin to find Jesus when we stop offering up a list of what will satisfy us and do some serious listening for the Spirit.
Serious listening requires silence and I’m not sure many of us make time in our lives for silence. Relationships with others and God have become cheaper, in general, due to so much electronic traffic from our multitude of devices along with our general life busy-ness. Can we have hundreds of friends on FaceBook without sacrificing some of the depth in our more personal relationships? Technology is not only attempting to fill the void that leads us to seeking God and the community of fellow believers in church, but it is also making our relationships more shallow and shortening our attention spans.
My question is can God be replaced by Candy Crush, FaceBook and all three seasons of Veronica Mars? Is there any part of us left that feels unfulfilled at the end of the day because we are missing out on a deeper relationship with our Creator? If not, then church will be reduced to a blog that we will read on the way to Starbucks or the gym. Church is about being in the presence of God and fellow believers. If we are satisfied with texting and blogging to fulfill us in our relationships with other humans, then we will look for God in those same venues.
1). I do think we should definitely advertise. 2). We should get out more – how about holding worship or community service events in public places? 3). Not just for the sake of the Episcopal Church, but for Christianity in general, since many millennials (and others) increasingly associate Christians with intolerance, judgementalism and anti-intellectualism.
Sorry if I seemed judgmental in my earlier comments – it was not my intent. This is a very important issue that I have been concerned about for some time. I have watched my own family’s church attendance drop through successive generations. I was reading the Bible last night and ran into Matthew 11:16-19 and wondered how much of this can be attributed to a lack of prioritization of people that don’t attend church and and how much can be blamed on the Church itself? Seems like soul searching on both sides is required. We have to figure out how to keep essential truths of Christianity without being justifiably accused of intolerance and judgementalism. We have to maintain our faith without being justifiably accused of being anti-intellectual. Is it even possible to have everyone agree on where these lines should be drawn?