Bandaids to Bricks

There’s isn’t a graduate of an Episcopal Seminary, the popular adult education offering Education for Ministry, or hopefully any graduate of a Confirmation or Inquirer’s class in the Episcopal Church that doesn’t have an image of the legendary Anglican thinker Richard Hooker’s three-legged stool firmly planted in their brains.  Our faith as Anglicans sits on three points – on a tripod of Scripture, Tradition and Reason.  Hooker’s image of a three-legged stool tells us what we value: We value Holy Scripture, we value Tradition and we strive for the intellectual inquiry necessary to avoid the cognitive dissonance that a rose-colored reading of Scripture so readily affords.   Three points always define a plane and as such our faith can stand on uneven ground.  But I suppose we could also say that the stool on which many of us rest our faith values scripture, values tradition, and values, above all, a faith that is rational – a faith that falls “within reason.”

But being faithful defies reason.  On June 27, ten days after the mass shooting at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, 30 year-old Bree Newsome Bree Newsomeclimbed a a thirty-foot flagpole outside the South Carolina statehouse to take down a confederate flag. Her decision to climb that flagpole was born out of a “crisis of faith” (a cognitive dissonance) following the shootings at Emanuel.   “I see people just going about their daily lives,” Newsome said, “and I just can’t do that.”  Newsome has said that when making the decision to climb that pole she was afraid for her life and as she descended its height kept repeating  Psalm 27: “The Lord is my light and my salvation, whom shall I fear?” Before climbing the pole Newsome says that she read the bible – the story of David and Goliath.

At St. Alban’s recently, we’ve heard Ruby Sales ask us if we are prepared to leave the Emperor’s table in order to go to “our Alabama.”  Ruby’s was an unreasonable request. President Obama, in his eulogy for Clementa Pinckney, said “Every time something like this happens, somebody says we have to have more conversations about race… but we don’t need more talk.”  A friend of mine today said, “We don’t need bandaids, we need bricks.”

Bree Newsome climbed that flagpole, fearing her life.  On her way down, while reciting scripture, a police officer talked to her, telling her, “You’re doing the wrong thing…” and then she was arrested and charged with defacing a monument.  But Bree made a brick. And on July 10 state legislators signed a bill authorizing the removal of the confederate flag, for good, from the SC statehouse.

At St. Alban’s this fall we’ll be talking, as always, about faith. We’ll be relying on Scripture, on Tradition, and on Reason.  And we’ll be talking about God’s Justice.  Because we live on uneven ground.  Along with those talks, maybe we’ll make some bricks.

Happy Monday,

Jim+ 143

Advertisements
This entry was posted in The Rev. Jim Quigley. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Bandaids to Bricks

  1. adam43g says:

    Your stool’s third leg of reason appears a little short when you carelessly get the names of the church in Charleston, and its minister, wrong. It is Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church — one m in Emanuel, belonging to the historic AME denomination, not some non-existent “African American Church”, and “Pinckney”, with an n.

    Why should we take your great ideas seriously when you slap something together without taking 30 seconds to check the basics?
    G. Adams

  2. jimq2012 says:

    Dear Adam, I’ve corrected the typos. Thanks. I’ll try to be more careful in the future but can promise you two things: Neither my eyesight nor my typing are likely to improve. Peace be with you. Jim

    • adam43g says:

      Dear Jim, my own eyesight and typing are not what they used to be, and weren’t that good to start with. That’s why I take the time to read over what I have typed. I have also found that if something is worth writing, it is worth writing correctly: mistakes distract the reader and raise doubts as to the writer’s ability and commitment. And there is a difference between “typos” and errors of substance (like the wrong name of the denomination, which you haven’t corrected yet, or misspelling the same word twice and only correcting it once).

      Please complete the corrections, and I’ll leave you in peace. Thank you.
      G. Adams (not “Adam”)

  3. jimq2012 says:

    G.Adams, I think I got them all. I’ve never considered myself a writer and will allow others to judge my commitment. Hopefully there will always be some substance to what I manage to post, beyond the errors. I’ve enjoyed this exchange, and hope you’ll stick around.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s